Search for: "Dept. of Human Resources v. Nation" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm by Michael B. Stack
Last week I sent out a survey and asked the question, How The Heck Did YOU End Up in Workers’ Comp? [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am by MBettman
Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Ohio Div. of Wildlife, 2015-Ohio-3731 (“[i]n reviewing a statute, a court cannot pick out one sentence and disassociate it from the context, but must look to the four corners of the enactment to determine the intent of the enacting body. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 3:23 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Cullman County Dept. of Human Resources (Indian Child Welfare Act - Notice) Zaunbrecher v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
  The Final RegulationsThis past Tuesday the government published in the Federal Register a series of final rules issued a few days earlier by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Hobby Lobby), explains how the RFRA formula relates to its prior free exercise doctrine as follows: RFRA was enacted three years after our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Hobby Lobby), explains how the RFRA formula relates to its prior free exercise doctrine as follows: RFRA was enacted three years after our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 4:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Baby Girl Borough of Jim Thorpe Carcieri challengers Cobell settlement beneficiaries Cohen Handbook Dept. of Justice Gray wolves Indian country pot growers National Native American Bar Assn. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
HHS argued that the RFRA was intended to restore the state of the law as it existed before Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:29 am by Heidi Henson
Previously, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs, the Supreme Court had ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provisions. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In 2003, in Nevada Dept of Human Resources v Hibbs (84 EPD ¶41,391), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity from claims under the FMLA’s family care provision in subparagraph (C). [read post]