Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. A. D. D. B."
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 9:20 am
LEXIS 101446 (D. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am
LEXIS 101446 (D. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
§ 1396p(d). [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
§ 1396p(d). [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
The Final RegulationsThis past Tuesday the government published in the Federal Register a series of final rules issued a few days earlier by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 2:00 am
Dept. of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
B. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
”[18] Taken together with the general lack of human infallibility, these facts should lower public confidence in the Canadian prosecutorial system because it may lead to an arbitrary and unchecked level of power for the individual prosecutor. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
”[18] Taken together with the general lack of human infallibility, these facts should lower public confidence in the Canadian prosecutorial system because it may lead to an arbitrary and unchecked level of power for the individual prosecutor. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 4:46 pm
Department of Health and Human Services for all filings and decision in full text2. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:33 am
Denver Dept. of Human Services, the trial court sustained an objection to a late “notice” on both notice and 403 grounds. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:26 pm
Could the expansion B its own worst enemy? [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
Rev. 1045-1083 (2011).Sielen, Alan B. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
VS Tech v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
See Callen v Callen, 287 AD2d 818 ( 3rd Dept 2001); In Re Rhianna R., 256 AD2d 1184 (4th Dept 1998) (citing Matter of Cary)(Mahady) v Megrell, 219 AD2d 334 (3rd Dept 1996), Iv App Dismissed, 88 NY2d 1065 1996); Dunbar v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The court held that the district court had the power to award restitution pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 53(b). [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:21 am
Bodden, 68 AD3d 871, 875; see Matter of Dox v. [read post]
