Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. E. N."
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
David E. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
Heller’s death by violating two laws: OCGA § 40-8-74 (e) (1), which mandates that "[a]ll tires . . . [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
N. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
The Final RegulationsThis past Tuesday the government published in the Federal Register a series of final rules issued a few days earlier by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
Cattle Growers’ Ass’n v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Petitioner Bostock worked for the Clayton County Juvenile Court System as a child welfare services coordinator. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:47 pm
Surry Sch Dept 54 IDELR 191, n. 3 (D. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
WA Dept. of Soc. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Tennessee Dept. of Transp., No. 07-6491 (6th Cir. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Bottini v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
However, originalist approaches the Coinage Clause and the N&P Clause just validate the long-standing status quo. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
