Search for: "Dept. of Human Services v. S. T." Results 21 - 40 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Comm., 290 A.D.2d 164 (2d Dept. 2001), "[t]he Second Department considered a motion for leave to file a late notice of claim, filed simultaneously with the complaint for violations of the Human Rights Law. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:40 am
Dep't of Health & Human Services, 360 N.C. 156, 622 S.E.2d 621 (2005), and held: Both parties recognized during the pendency of this appeal that, as in Mooresville,  the appeal could become moot upon the completion of BMA's facility. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, No. 08-1048TVIISee issue description (+briefs links) at SCOTUSblogSCOTUS docket hereStoyanov v. [read post]
Today, in our predominately rural/wilderness borough, these companion animals continue to provide many of us companionship and a measurable sense of well being1 as well as more utilitarian services such as rodent control and early warning of potential dangers2 such as bears and intruding humans. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
 Many if not most homeowners insure their homes under insurance policies that utilize as their main policy form the Insurance Services Office's copyrighted HO-3 endorsement. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:30 pm by Ilya Somin
US Dept. of Health and Human Services, the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld a trial court decision refusing to issue a preliminary injunction against the Centers for Disease Control nationwide eviction moratorium. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
And I urge you not to miss the paragraph they ended with: In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
HHS argued that the RFRA was intended to restore the state of the law as it existed before Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990). [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:36 am by Jeff Welty
North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources, 347 N.C. 247 (1997), where a majority of the court held that the state could choose to pay for the childbirth expenses of indigent women but not for medically necessary abortions for the same population. [read post]