Search for: "Designer's Furniture, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2019, 3:23 am
Furniture Company, Inc., Serial No. 87567505 (August 26, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm
The drafters could have just tossed "furniture" into the first sentence's list of exclusions. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:09 am
In re Nett Designs Inc., 236 F.3d 1339, 57 USPQ2d 1564, 1566 (Fed. [read post]
TTAB Vacates Prince of Wales Section 2(b) Decision and Remands Application to the Examining Attorney
21 Mar 2018, 4:06 am
Body Action Design Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1719, 1721 (Fed. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Winter, Clark County Legal Services Program, Inc., Las Vegas, NV, for the plaintiffs-appellants. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
The TTAB affirmed a Section 2(b) refusal of the mark shown below left, for various goods including furniture, dinnerware, and fabrics, on the ground that the mark comprises a design that simulates a governmental insignia of the United Kingdom, namely, the Prince of Wales’ emblem, shown below right. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 3:12 am
Gorowitz) [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark SHEPHERD ARTISAN COFFEE & Design (below left) for "coffee shops" [ARTISAN COFFEE disclaimed] in view of the registered marks SHEPHARD'S BEACH RESORT in standard character form, and SHEPARD'S BEACH RESORT & Design (below right) [BEACH RESORT disclaimed], for "hotel services and restaurant services"].In re Delta Faucet Company , Serial No. 87044505 (December… [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 3:09 am
According to the examining attorney, the combination creates no new commercial impression or incongruity, and no imagination is needed to understand the nature of the services.As to applicant's double entendre argument, the Board noted that the mark must be considered in the context of applicant's services, and the impression created by the purported double entendre "must be sufficiently strong as to be appreciated in the context of… [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 2:42 am
Prior art is analogous if it belongs to the same field of endeavor, or if not, is “reasonably pertinent“ to the particular problem, so that it logically would have commended itself to the inventor's attention (Circuit Check Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
LON SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
LON SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:29 am
[But what about the goods that overlap with registrant's goods? [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 11:59 am
"Some snippets:"The facts are somewhat unusual: the alleged infringer, leather furniture manufacturer Omnia Italian Design, Inc. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:59 am
Sec., Inc., 194 USPQ 344, 346 (TTAB 1977).The Board noted several differences, including the banner and wording "Ich Dien," which are missing from applicant's mark. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:39 pm
Everyone should pass this test; it's still California we're talking about. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:35 am
It's Free. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
In re Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc., Serial No. 85164876 (May 11, 2016) [precedential]. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:02 am
January 11, 2017 -11 AM: In re Shabby Chic Brands LLC, Serial No. 85135970 [Section 2(b) refusal of the mark shown below left, for various goods in class 20, 21, and 24, including furniture, dinnerware, and fabrics, on the ground that the mark includes a simulation or design that resembles a governmental insignia of the United Kingdom’s Prince of Wales emblem (shown below right)]. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Varsity Brands, Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:59 am
Likewise with home design, COLLECTION does not refer to any class or category. [read post]
