Search for: "Dinardo v. Dinardo"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2022, 1:00 am
In the case of Dinardo v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 1:50 pm
In addition, said the court, the "assurance" by the municipal defendant must be definite enough to generate justifiable reliance by [Wilson]" citing Dinardo v City of New York, 13 NY3d 872.Ruling that the Board of Education established, prima facie, that it did not owe Wilson a special duty and that Wilson failed to raise a triable issue of fact, the Appellate Division said it agreed with the Supreme Court's determination granting BOE's motion for summary… [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 1:50 pm
In addition, said the court, the "assurance" by the municipal defendant must be definite enough to generate justifiable reliance by [Wilson]" citing Dinardo v City of New York, 13 NY3d 872.Ruling that the Board of Education established, prima facie, that it did not owe Wilson a special duty and that Wilson failed to raise a triable issue of fact, the Appellate Division said it agreed with the Supreme Court's determination granting BOE's motion for summary… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 10:14 am
DiNardo given both the amount of discovery that would take place and the legal issues at play. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:28 pm
DiNardo and Butts v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 8:32 pm
Dinardo. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:48 pm
In Monday’s argument in Sandifer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:38 am
But on the other, I think an opponent may want to raise the issue. 3/5/2010 And again: Bysiewicz v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 11:59 am
DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, which attracted an overflow crowd. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
Dinardo, 2013 U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:43 am
DiNardo. [read post]
6 May 2016, 11:21 am
Dinardo (Sullivan & Worcester LLP). [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 8:17 pm
Bysiewicz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:13 pm
(see brief article here by attorney Mark Bello announcing in summer, 2009, Ohio House Bill 248 effective August 27, 2008, Ohio Revised Code § 1349.55) (Mark Bello turns out to work for Lawsuit Finance, and blogs at Lawsuit Finance Blog) (Ohio's Supreme Court had first declared litigation finance barred by champerty, in Rancman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:37 am
Collins, Collins & Dinardo, P.C., No. 90-CV-5278, 1992 WL 168267, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:04 am
" Lipani v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:38 pm
DiNardo Cases. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 1:14 pm
One would expect the City of New York to appeal this decision, especially in light of the more recent Court of Appeals decision in Dinardo v. [read post]
