Search for: "Diodes Incorporated "
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2011, 12:26 pm
Claim 10 depends from claim 9 and further requires that at least one circuit component be a circuit component selected from a group consisting of: “a capacitor, a diode, a resistor, a transistor, a voltage source, a current source, an electrical short circuit, and an inductor. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
The Court then turned to petitioner’s argument that three provisions that did apply conferred additional discretion, namely provisions requiring: (1) a 50-foot setback from wetlands, “unless a wetlands biologist recommends a different setback”; (2) stormwater to be diverted “to the nearest practicable disposal location”; and (3) incorporation “of natural drainage features…whenever possible. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 10:41 am
Title 1 D0871558 Faucet body 2 D0871557 Faucet body 3 D0871556 Faucet body 4 D0871555 Faucet spout 5 D0871554 Faucet handle 6 D0871549 Faucet 7 D0871548 Faucet 8 D0871547 Faucet 9 D0871546 Faucet 10 10,524,110 Affirmative pairing systems and methods for devices 11 10,523,003 Auxiliary power circuit and method of use 12 10,522,854 Digital twin based management system and method and digital twin based fuel cell management system and method 13 10,520,520 Transport device with base plate modules 14… [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
Trade Agreements Act compliance changed fundamentally three years ago. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
Trade Agreements Act compliance changed fundamentally three years ago. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Petitioners raised several arguments: (1) unusual circumstances and the incorporation of “mitigation” undermined use of the exemptions; (2) a flawed project description; (3) a lack of evidence to support approval of the CUP; and (4) the CUP approval was in conflict with the City’s zoning code and general plan. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The court then turned to petitioner’s argument that three provisions that did apply conferred additional discretion, namely provisions requiring: (1) a 50-foot setback from wetlands, “unless a wetlands biologist recommends a different setback”; (2) stormwater to be diverted “to the nearest practicable disposal location”; and (3) incorporation “of natural drainage features…whenever possible. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The court then turned to petitioner’s argument that three provisions that did apply conferred additional discretion, namely provisions requiring: (1) a 50-foot setback from wetlands, “unless a wetlands biologist recommends a different setback”; (2) stormwater to be diverted “to the nearest practicable disposal location”; and (3) incorporation “of natural drainage features…whenever possible. [read post]
