Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,921
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2010, 1:53 pm
On March 31, 2010, a Federal District Court barred two direct purchasers of hydrogen peroxide and derivative products (“Plaintiffs”) from pursuing antitrust damages arising from their foreign product purchases, because Plaintiffs’ allegations failed to satisfy the two-step proximate cause requirement of the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act of 1982 (“FTAIA”). [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 5:58 am
Aug. 31, 2023), plaintiff purchased a home at auction and later brought this claim against defendant, who marketed and facilitated the auction. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 11:29 am
Aug. 14, 2019), plaintiff purchased over 200 trucks from defendant to use in its logistics and hauling company. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:38 am
The plaintiffs were also unable to show that any increased cost to the direct purchasers was passed through to the indirect purchasers. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 6:00 am
Nov. 23, 2022), the issues revolved around plaintiff’s purchase of a home. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 7:25 pm
That ruling came before the Court of Appeal on plaintiff's petition for a writ of mandate.Microsoft's authority for the limitation to direct purchasers was a single sentence in Korea Supply (29 Cal.4th at 1149). [read post]
20 May 2008, 9:46 am
On May 2, 2008, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted class certification in In re Wellbutrin SR Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig., No. 04-5525, 2008 WL 1946858 (E.D. [read post]
14 May 2008, 5:20 am
” In re Wellbutrin SR Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig., ___ F.Supp.2d ___ (E.D. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:23 am
First, as here, where damages are claimed in the aggregate (i.e., a single global sum for direct and indirect classes), there can be no double or multiple recovery by plaintiffs. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:51 am
Finally, the court found the direct purchaser plaintiffs’ complaint was insufficient under the Twombly pleading standards. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
” Plaintiff cooperative corporation purchased a commercial general liability policy from Defendant insurer covering the relevant time period. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
” Plaintiff cooperative corporation purchased a commercial general liability policy from Defendant insurer covering the relevant time period. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
As such, plaintiffs were indirect purchasers to whom the direct purchaser banks passed on all or a part of the allegedly fixed fees, and their claims were barred by the Illinois Brick indirect purchaser rule. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:18 am
Plaintiff’s was 39. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:09 am
[that] establishes only an indirect connection between the U.S. prices and the prices [plaintiffs] paid when they purchased vitamins abroad. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm
Simply stated, a direct purchaser is someone that purchased a product directly from a defendant. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:01 am
” The court rejected the defendants’ argument that the plaintiffs’ failure to purchase their Lancelot interest through the defendants defeated the plaintiffs’ cause of action, because the Colorado Securities Act does not require privity. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:05 pm
NYSE clarified the scope and applicability of Nortel’s “direct relationship” test to non-issuers, addressing some of the problems with Nortel’s holding. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:35 am
Id. at *9 (“Here, Plaintiff lacks Article III standing to bring claims on behalf of the . . . products he did not purchase because he cannot conceivably allege any injuries from the products that he never purchased or used. [read post]
