Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:23 am
We will not purchase any of these items as we only deal direct [sic] with the authenticator. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:17 am
” Judge Koetl’s decision adds an interesting new layer to the evolving analysis of the question of when alleged misrepresentations made by one party can be attributed to another party. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
City of Yucaipa (Target Stores, Inc., Real Party In Interest) (4th Dist., Div. 2, 2015) ____ Cal.App.4th ____, 2015 WL 3564971. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:19 pm
L-1812-04, that a cause of action under New Jersey's Consumer Fraud Act exists where there is no direct contact between the parties but there is a connection between the defendants' "alleged violation of the Consumer Fraud Act and plaintiff's ascertainable loss. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:26 am
This week, we highlight cert petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether courts can direct leftover class-action settlement funds to charities or nonprofits supposedly aligned with class members’ interests. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
Contracts -- Real property sale -- Failure to consummate contract -- Purchaser's contract claims for damages and specific performance based on failure to consummate contract for purchase of residential property are barred by remedies limitation provision of the residential contract -- Remedies limitation provision does not contain an unreasonable disparity in remedy alternatives available to parties and thus does not lack mutuality and is enforceable --… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Therefore, they argued, the consumers are the real parties in interest, not the State. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:01 pm
Case Background The plaintiff is a home builder and in 1999 he started negotiations for the purchase of a home that he was building. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:01 pm
Case Background The plaintiff is a home builder and in 1999 he started negotiations for the purchase of a home that he was building. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 5:53 am
The other named plaintiff, Craig Bailey, purchased shares of Acamar prior to the merger. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:46 am
After it became clear that the parties could not agree on a purchaser for the property, they agreed to sell the Estate’s 49% interest to the son, Michael Wahba, for $2.75 million. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 10:00 am
Shortly thereafter, the Defendants began purchasing the invention from the Plaintiff and reselling it through Amazon. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:01 pm
” Shortly thereafter, “Party A,” one of two direct channel competitors, expressed interest in acquiring BJ’s; however, because Party A “had no prior history of acquiring domestic companies” and BJ’s board of directors was “not comfortable sharing material, non-public information with a direct competitor,” Party A was rebuffed. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am
The defendant brother opposed the requested injunction, as summarized by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrew Borrok in his decision granting the injunction, on the ground that defendant “merely transferred his stock or membership interests and that he somehow retained interests in the company’s good will. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
Pursuant to an oral agreement, which is reflected in various invoices and purchase orders, International then hired plaintiff's employer, third-party and second-third party defendant Heatley Installations (Heatley), to disassemble the furniture rack system and transport it to another location. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
Pursuant to an oral agreement, which is reflected in various invoices and purchase orders, International then hired plaintiff's employer, third-party and second-third party defendant Heatley Installations (Heatley), to disassemble the furniture rack system and transport it to another location. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 3:50 pm
As a result, the "conflicting contentions of the parties . . . present a real, substantial controversy between parties having adverse legal interests, a dispute definite and concrete, not hypothetical or abstract. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:16 am
” It later designated the Investors as the moving party. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:09 pm
., Plaintiff alleged that he received an unsolicited call from a third-party agency inquiring as to Plaintiff’s interest in automotive insurance. [read post]
