Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2018, 12:39 pm by Guest Blogger
Chief Disciplinary Counsel Retiring Linda Acevedo is retiring in January 2019 after nearly 10 years as chief disciplinary counsel and 33 years with the State Bar, and we thanked her for her many years of service. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
Our letter: * * * July 26, 2018 Elizabeth Clark Tarbert Ethics Counsel The Florida Bar 651 E. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Legal Beagle
  In Bartos v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2015 SC 690, at its own instance the court raised a question as to the proper approach to certain provisions in the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 (the Act). [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
R. v Clarke, 2016 ONSC 1510 [10] Finally, the officer’s testimony in court was frequently evasive or misleading. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
Clark, the 1st District holds that the mistrial was based on manifest necessity, and that double jeopardy didn’t prevent a retrial… A lengthy, and excellent, opinion from the 10th District in State v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:10 am by Anita Davies
At a meeting last Thursday, the BSB decided it will regulate advocacy focused alternative business structures, legal disciplinary practices (LDPs) and barrister-only entities, but not multi-disciplinary practices. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:40 pm
District Judge Garrett Brown Jr. held in Rocheux International v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
This is an appeal by Mr David Lander (the solicitor) against a finding of the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal handed down on 30 July 2008 and of the orders made on 24 September 2008.2. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
"  Ross Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:36 pm
For the foregoing reasons, reasons, I respectfully dissent and would reverse the judgment of the trial court.InMark Clarke v. [read post]