Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Delay"
Results 21 - 40
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2016, 9:02 am
In Kaur v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:15 pm
LEXIS 45812 (ED CA, June 15, 2007), a California federal district court awarded limited attorneys fees to counsel who was partially successful in a prisoner's challenge to prison grooming standards by negotiating a settlement that expunged the prisoner's disciplinary record regarding grooming violations.In Key v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:33 pm
From Phillips v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
Azar v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
[Counsel for IB]: It didn't come up in testimony. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:13 am
Trial delays primarily attributable to COVID-19 pandemic did not violate defendant’s statutory or constitutional speedy trial rights U.S. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:03 pm
By Daniel RichardsonRutland Herald v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:37 am
An excerpt from Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 6:51 pm
Duty v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:09 am
Petition in Hargan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Holt v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Holt v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:22 am
"* The Town consented to the adjournment, and the parties' respective counsel thereafter agreed that the hearing would be adjourned until March 20, 2006. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:20 pm
To determine “whether the moving party has waived its right to object to the opposing party’s counsel, consideration must be given to: (1) the length of the delay in bringing the motion to disqualify; (2) when the movant learned of the conflict; (3) whether the movant was represented by counsel during the delay; (4) why the delay occurred; and (5) whether disqualification would result in prejudice to the non-moving party. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
The government also wants the Court to take disciplinary action against Jane Doe’s counsel. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:53 pm
LEXIS 975 (Ohio App 9th 3/24/2010) Postconviction relief denied on appeal on issues relating to failure to permit discovery, funding experts, ineffective assistance of counsel (trial court chose wrong standard to examine claims, failure to investigate and present, use of experts (cultural, DNA & neurological), as well as “lead counsel’s substance abuse, disciplinary investigation, and, ultimately, his arrest”) Ruben Gutierrez v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm
The authority to determine licensing and disciplinary matters typically resides, in the end, with the highest court in a state. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:06 pm
” Doe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:31 am
NYS Liquor Authority NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticeProsecutors Charged For Unexplained Delay; Indictment Dismissed on Speedy Trial GroundsPeople v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
