Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Deters" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 9:52 am by Susan Brenner
This post is about an attorney discipline matter heard by the South Carolina Judicial Department’s Office of Disciplinary Counsel. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:05 pm
Courts have an interest as well; Judge Kozinski should know how his opinion in Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:22 am
Groner: The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent engaged in a conflict of interest and engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:15 am
[the Supreme Court has left] open the possibility that the goal of deterring future misconduct would justify using the supervisory power to redress conduct not injuring defendants if the conduct is plainly improper, indisputably outrageous, and not redressable through the utilization of less drastic disciplinary tools. [read post]
23 May 2016, 5:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court, 471 U.S. 626 (1985), not strict scrutiny, applied. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio (1985) (same); Holloman v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
Appellant replied that he was not licensed in Minnesota and that if he needed to file suit in Minnesota he would hire local counsel. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, rational students would be deterred not just in their speech on campus, but also in anything they publish or say, whether online, in letters to the editor, or for that matter in casual conversation. [read post]