Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Sharp" Results 21 - 27 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Book Review: Fighting Fair – Legal Ethics for an Adversarial Age
1 Jan 2016, 4:01 am by Ken Chasse
There is sharp debate as to what to do if Z insists that his lawyer keep the report confidential and not disclose it to anyone. [read post]
Slaw - http://www.slaw.ca
Argument preview: Faith, teaching, and the Constitution
30 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
The case is Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
"For meg er det et mysterium at regjeringen skal legge seg opp i dette på denne måten" [For me, it is a mystery that the government should get involved in this in this way], Unraveling the "Mystery" of the Norwegian Government's Block of Rules Limiting Lawyer Advice that Entails Human Rights Violations
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
The UNGPs present significant opportunities for lawyers who advise business, both internal and external counsel, based on the increasing demand for such advise by clients. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
Deep Six to Rule 56
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
On January 12, 1994, to distinguish a German reference labeled D1, which required a diffusion-limiting membrane, Abbott's European patent counsel argued that their invention did not require a diffusion-limiting membrane. [read post]
Patent Prospector - http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/
Purdue's Poison Pill and the Broken Chapter 11 System
6 Dec 2020, 5:06 pm by Adam Levitin
" It's impossible (I think) to square this with the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]
Credit Slips - http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/
"Duties and Conduct of Advocates" : Supreme Court Explains
28 May 2011, 7:56 am by The Legal Blog
Sharma v. [read post]
The Legal Blog.in - http://www.legalblog.in/
Bull… meet China Shop. SB 94 and the California State Bar, Two Years Later
30 Oct 2011, 6:25 am by Mandelman
” Lawyers v. [read post]
Mandelman Matters - http://mandelman.ml-implode.com