Search for: "District Counsel 37"
Results 21 - 40
of 937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 8:00 am
FRAMENT OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:05 am
Lake Arrowhead Community Services District (2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 734. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:05 am
Lake Arrowhead Community Services District (2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 734. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
The post The Risks of “Failed” Spoliation Efforts: The Southern District of New York Finds Severe Sanctions Available Under Rule 37(b)(2) and Inherent Authority for “Incompetent Spoliators” appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
The post The Risks of “Failed” Spoliation Efforts: The Southern District of New York Finds Severe Sanctions Available Under Rule 37(b)(2) and Inherent Authority for “Incompetent Spoliators” appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
The post The Risks of “Failed” Spoliation Efforts: The Southern District of New York Finds Severe Sanctions Available Under Rule 37(b)(2) and Inherent Authority for “Incompetent Spoliators” appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
Olson, Appellate Counsel; Eric M. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 4:00 am
District Judge’s recommendation. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
Declining to issue terminating sanctions against Google, the court instead issued monetary sanctions including counsel fees incurred by the plaintiffs in preparation and filing of its Rule 37 motion. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
Declining to issue terminating sanctions against Google, the court instead issued monetary sanctions including counsel fees incurred by the plaintiffs in preparation and filing of its Rule 37 motion. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
Declining to issue terminating sanctions against Google, the court instead issued monetary sanctions including counsel fees incurred by the plaintiffs in preparation and filing of its Rule 37 motion. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:01 pm
The case will appear before US District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:22 pm
Today, counsel for Saeed Mohammed Hatim filed an “Emergency Motion Concerning Access to Counsel,” both in the Yemeni detainee’s recently reactivated habeas action, and in In Re: Guantanamo Bay Detainee Continued Access to Counsel, a separate matter on the district court’s miscellaneous docket. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 2:03 pm
Upon consideration of petitioners’ Motions [37 and 38], the government’s Opposition [42], petitioners’ replies [44 and 45], the arguments presented at this Court’s open and sealed hearings held June 5, 2013, the entire record herein, the applicable law, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court finds the JDG’s new procedures invalid as they pertain to access to counsel and will GRANT petitioners’ motions in part and DENY petitioners’… [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am
The court concluded that sanctions were warranted under Rule 37(c) and the court’s inherent authority to impose sanctions. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am
The court concluded that sanctions were warranted under Rule 37(c) and the court’s inherent authority to impose sanctions. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:04 am
The court concluded that sanctions were warranted under Rule 37(c) and the court’s inherent authority to impose sanctions. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:17 am
Kerin, Appellate Counsel; Kirk A. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:33 am
Gerson, of the Miami personal injury law offices of Gerson and Schwartz, PA served as lead counsel and argued the matter in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 7:04 am
Counsel should therefore have taken care to avail themselves of procedures to avoid inadvertent disclosure of protected confidential information such as a motion to seal under 37 C.F.R. [read post]
