Search for: "District Properties Associates et al., Appellants v. the District of Columbia et al"
Results 21 - 27
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
SMITH, ET AL. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Texas, et al. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
GARZA ENERGY TRUST ET AL.; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-02-00136-CV, 166 SW3d 301, 05-05-05)The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment, renders judgment in part, and remands the case to the trial court. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
Only the District of Columbia bans camera coverage of all judicial proceedings. [read post]
