Search for: "District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board" Results 21 - 40 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2009, 3:07 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITImmigration Law Free With Registration: Nurse Not a "Persecutor" Under Immigration Law for Working at Hospital That Performed Forced Abortions NEW YORK COUNTYContracts Breach of Contract Cause of Action Against Insurance Company Survives Dismissal Forman v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:37 am by Joy Waltemath
The hospitals have appealed a March 30, 2013, ruling by the federal district court for the District of Columbia holding that although the hospitals did not directly contract with the federal government, they were still subject to OFCCP jurisdiction as federal subcontractors. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:16 am by James J. La Rocca
In a groundbreaking opinion, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals has ruled that three appointments of officers to the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board” or the “NLRB”) by President Barrack Obama were unconstitutional because they lacked the “Advice and Consent” of the Senate and were not authorized by the Constitution’s so-called Recess Appointments Clause. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Edith Roberts
Attorney for the District of Columbia, Thapar moved back to Ohio in 2001. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:29 am
 That policy that underlies the doctrine might arguably be thought to extend with equal felicity to subcontracts under government prime contracts, but – until UPMC-Braddock – we were aware of no Board of Contract Appeals or court that has so held. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
  The United States District Court for the District of Columbia agreed and dismissed the Plaintiffs complaints. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:16 pm by Sunni Yuen
On review, the Appellate Division adopted, with modifications, a four-factor test that had been applied by the federal district court in the Northern District of California in Columbia Insurance Company v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
     The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, in a split decision, reversed. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 11:25 am by James Hamilton
SEC, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 10-1305, Nov. 30, 2010.Armed with specific congressional authorization, the SEC adopted shareholder proxy access, Rule 14a-11, which is shorthand for a regulatory framework under which a shareholder may require the company to include in its proxy statement and proxy card a person nominated by the shareholder, and not by the board, for election to the board. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 6:21 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the appeals court affirmed dismissal of her claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and dealing, and negligent supervision (Brown v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am by Ben
Leon in the District of Columbia has approved the Sirius' motion to stay the lawsuit from SoundExchange to await the decision of a hearing with the federal Copyright Royalty Board - the body that sets the statutory rates that Sirius XM must pay - and if these can include revenues purportedly attributable to performances of pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am by John Floyd
”   Judge Bates, who now enjoys senior status in the District Court for the District of Columbia, knows about which he speaks. [read post]