Search for: "District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board"
Results 21 - 40
of 157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 4:26 am
IndiaSarmila v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
Most states, as well as the District of Columbia, allow any eligible voter to vote via an absentee ballot without providing an excuse. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
Most states, as well as the District of Columbia, allow any eligible voter to vote via an absentee ballot without providing an excuse. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, similarly served less than three years as an appeals court judge before Bush nominated him to the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm
In Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit v Ontario Nurses’ Association, the Ontario Labour Relations Board did not consider a nurse who had been involved in pandemic planning as exercising managerial functions under the Labour Relations Act. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) The following are job announcements of potential interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
Matter of City of Burlington Board of Education v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:32 pm
Committee of Neighbors Directly Impacted by Lamb Application v District of Columbia Board of Adjustment, 2019 WL 5617815 (DC CA 10/31/2019) [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a bipartisan appeal from lawmakers to upend precedent on campaign finance law, upholding an earlier decision. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
See Final Decree, in Transcript of Re cord, West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
