Search for: "District of Columbia v. Royal" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2011, 7:07 am
The Ninth Circuit therefore joins the District of Columbia Circuit in Doe v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am by Anthony Colangelo
District Court for the District of Columbia referenced my most-noted formulation of this principle in a foreign-cubed piracy case, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:16 pm
Fortunately, as illustrated by a recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in The Sidney and North Saanich Memorial Park Society v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:33 am by Andrew Ramonas
District Court for the District of Columbia in August 2009 with the company, Zoe Tillman reports. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm by Antonin I. Pribetic
Madam Justice Allen notes, [4]         On a standard of “clear and convincing evidence”, the Plaintiffs proved their claim to the satisfaction of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On 25 October 2016, the Press Recognition Panel (“PRP”) approved IMPRESS as a regulator which satisfied the criteria set out in the Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:40 am by Hadley Baker, Vishnu Kannan
Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the District of Columbia rejected a request from the House Judiciary Committee to have the same judge rule in a case involving former White House counsel Don McGahn and another involving grand jury material relating to former special counsel Robert Mueller’s report, according to the Hill. [read post]
LLC),[5] and the other in the District of Columbia Circuit (see Judge Rogers in Doe v Exxon).[6] Both of these opinions support corporate liability under the ATS and likewise reflect the reasoning of Murray, Kinley and Pitts that the rumours of the death of corporate liability under the ATS are greatly exaggerated. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
For The Economist, Steven Mazie writes that this “is the case gun-rights advocates have been waiting for since 2008, when the Supreme Court first recognised an individual right to own a gun for self-defence” in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
Jordan Lorence of the Alliance Defending Freedom is here, likely awaiting the decision in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
The defendants in Handy    first were indicted  in the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:02 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the view advanced by the Second Circuit last September in Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eleanor Runde
District Court for the District of Columbia over allegations of torture, detention and extrajudicial killing. [read post]