Search for: "Dixon v. Williams" Results 21 - 40 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2015, 2:18 pm
Dixon and Foster, 509 U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2849, 125 L.Ed.2d 556 [1993]; See Hicks on behalf of Feiock v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 6:30 am by Jeff Welty
Williams and Dixon both state that a permanent scar is not necessarily sufficiently disfiguring as to constitute serious bodily injury, but in State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:15 am
Well perhaps Behzadi v Behzadi would have made it in because of the amount of ground it covered, the 'Barder-event' case Dixon v Marchant was important, as was the Brussells II case Bush v Bush. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am by thejaghunter
Dixon ordered the Kellers out fearing the lesson the Kellers might learn watching Dixon inside. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
Williams, it reverses the denial of a suppression motion where the officer stopped a vehicle which had dealer’s plates because it was 8:30 PM, after dealerships were closed. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:49 am
Williams     Western District of Tennessee at Memphis 08a0662n.06  USA v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:14 pm by Gregory Forman
Hopefully shamming my colleague who refuse to handle appeals, in Williams v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 10:05 pm by Monique Altheim
newsitemid=25441&topic=sibos … Keyloggers found on 10 Nordstrom registers in Florida – Ten registers in Nordstrom stores in Aventura Florida repo… http://ow.ly/2BwklW  Employee Termination Based on Mistaken Belief of Facebook Post Authorship Upheld Smizer v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am by war
To say that is not to gainsay the point made by Dixon CJ in Mark Foy’s Ltd v Davies Coop and Co Ltd (1956) 95 CLR 190 at 194–5 (the Tub Happy case), that language is not always used to convey a single, clear idea; a mark may have a descriptive element but still serve as a badge of trade origin. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm by Sandy Levinson
9:00am-10:45amChair: William Forbath (Texas)Samuel Issacharoff (NYU)Scot Peterson (Oxford)Mark Tushnet (Harvard)Mila Versteeg (Virginia) Session VI: Constitutional Replacement by Constitutional Amendment11:00am-12:45pmChair: Sergio Verdugo (Universidad del Desarrollo – Chile)Carlos Bernal (Constitutional Court of Colombia)John Dinan (Wake Forest)Rosalind Dixon (Australia, University of New South Wales)Sanford Levinson (Texas) [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:54 pm
" Unfortunately, the ruling in Christian Research Institute v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Dixon and Foster, 509 U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2849, 125 L.Ed.2d 556 [1993]; See Hicks on behalf of Feiock v. [read post]