Search for: "Doe v. Reed" Results 21 - 40 of 1,661
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm by Alden Abbott
FTC that Section 13(b) does not authorize the commission to obtain court-ordered monetary relief (such as restitution or disgorgement). [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
 February 4, 2024 Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am by David Pocklington
Given the subject matter of the petition, r.9.3 does not apply and I do not consider that there is any need to give notice to such bodies. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am by David Pocklington
But what is of relevance is the reliance that the Deputy Chancellor placed (at paragraph 9) upon observations from the judgment of Lord Reed, in the Supreme Court, in Walton v The Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44, [2013] PTSR 51 (at paragraph 92) drawing a distinction between ‘the mere busybody and the person affected by or having a reasonable concern in the matter to which the application relates’. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 11:48 am by Steven Calabresi
It turns out that Chief Justice Roberts was the only one of the nine justices to get NFIB v. [read post]