Search for: "Doe 2 v. Rosa"
Results 21 - 40
of 156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2018, 11:15 am
Special Rules for Domestic Violence Cases in Michigan In People v Rosa, 336445, the Michigan Court of Appeals interpreted one of the special evidence rules that apply to domestic violence cases. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
Thomas v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Moreover, most courts have held that school districts are not entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity.2 11 In Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:44 am
Rosa, 2013-Ohio-5867 (7th Dist.) [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Board of Education, Commack UFSD v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Board of Education, Commack UFSD v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
SANTA ROSA, CA — This is my upcoming article in the Empire Law Review (sans footnotes) Brendlin v California: Expansion of Fourth Amendment Standing or the End of a Legal Fiction? [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:19 am
See Citigroup Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:33 am
Rosa, supra (quoting Herring v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
What does it do for TM? [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:24 am
In Matter of Joseph Nemeth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 5:01 am
It does not, however, provide an adequate substitute for access. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:04 am
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 4:28 pm
Id.; Lee v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:28 am
OAR 150-316.027(2). [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 3:10 pm
Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Rosa v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. 2024 NY Slip Op 02538 Decided on May 8, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Rosa v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. 2024 NY Slip Op 02538 Decided on May 8, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:52 am
In or about April, 2009, Luis Santiago-Caro was introduced to Luis Conde-Rosa at which time Santiago-Caro agreed, with the consent of Juan Carlos Mattei-Marcano, to pay Conde-Rosa 2 percent for all contracts awarded to School Solutions by procurement officers that Conde-Rosa supervised. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:52 am
In or about April, 2009, Luis Santiago-Caro was introduced to Luis Conde-Rosa at which time Santiago-Caro agreed, with the consent of Juan Carlos Mattei-Marcano, to pay Conde-Rosa 2 percent for all contracts awarded to School Solutions by procurement officers that Conde-Rosa supervised. [read post]