Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-10, Inclusive"
Results 21 - 40
of 758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
It was only necessary to consider claim 1:“A buprenorphine transdermal delivery device comprising a polymer matrix layer containing buprenorphine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in treating pain in humans for a dosing interval of at least 7 days, wherein the transdermal delivery device comprises 10 %-wt buprenorphine base, 10 to 15 %-wt levulinic acid, about 10 %-wt oleyloleate, 55 to 70 %-wt polyacrylate, and 0 to 10 %-wt… [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 5:00 pm
The defendant shall, at a minimum, be required to complete a DUI or substance abuse court referral program approved by the Administrative Office of Courts and operated in accordance with provisions of the Mandatory Treatment Act of 1990, sections 12-23-1 to 12-23-19 inclusive. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:38 pm
Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
The trial court sentenced defendant to concurrent terms of 3 to 20 years' imprisonment, with credit for 10 days. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:40 am
On May 10, 2013, Res-Care made an offer of judgment to the individual Plaintiff in the amount of $25,000. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:44 pm
-based public corporations.[1] During the preceding 12 months, 59 of the 211 class action complaints that allege violations of Rule 10b-5 have been filed against a defendant company that had already been sued for similar allegations of fraud on the market. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Inclusion of a pharmacogenomic test in the labeling would be contingent upon its performance characteristics.FDA, Guidance for Industry, Pharmacogenomic Data Submissions, at 5 (March 2005) (available here). [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:38 pm
Louisiana, the Court ruled that the reasonable doubt standard does not demand jury unanimity and that verdicts of 10 (as in Louisiana) and 9 (as in Oregon) out of twelve are constitutionally permissible. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
But this Act does. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
She highlighted how Perfect 10 is not really part of an “unbroken line of authority” (as argued, instead, by the defendants). [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:02 pm
The defendant was charged with Aggravated Harassment in violation of Penal Law 240.30(1) and Criminal Contempt in the Second Degree in violation of Penal Law 215.50(3) in an information bearing index number 19402/93. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:09 pm
Murdock agreed to pay the settlement amount on the defendants’ behalf. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
In his judgment (Ali & Anor v Channel 5 Broadcast Ltd [2018] EWHC 298 (Ch)) Arnold J accepted that the Defendant’s programme did contribute to a debate of public interest, but considered that the inclusion of the Claimants’ private information went beyond what was justified for that purpose. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:45 am
Yesterday was 6-10 and today, we make the big reveal: numbers 1-5. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:08 am
Id.at *10. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
” (§ 21167.6(e)(10).) [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:17 am
2C:16-1. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:57 pm
Does not touch heal-to-toe; 5.) [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 11:27 am
A suggestion from the defendant that ‘rent’ should be implied into s.47 was not accepted, given its express inclusion in s.48 (address for service of notices). [read post]
