Search for: "Doe Message Sender" Results 21 - 40 of 680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
One who jostles one's neighbor in a crowd does not invade the rights of others standing at the outer fringe when the unintended contact casts a bomb upon the ground. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:53 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
No direct liability as senders Plaintiffs implicitly acknowledged Archer, a non-party who had declared bankruptcy, actually sent the messages. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 9:24 pm by Evan Brown
Plaintiff filed a defamation lawsuit against the anonymous sender of the email and sent a subpoena to Google to find out the IP address from which the message was sent. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 6:18 am by Jon Gelman
We affirm thetrial court's order dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against the sender of the text messages, but we do not adopt the trial court's reasoning that a remote texter does not have a legal duty to avoid sending text messages to one who is driving." [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:20 am by Susan Brenner
The court observed that, as with non-electronic documents generally, the identity of the sender is critical to the authentication of text messages,and that `the difficulty that frequently arises in . . . text message cases is establishing authorship. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:05 am
Does the sender have some duty toward the injured victim, and did the sender violate the standard of care expected of a reasonable texter? [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 10:59 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
The confirmatory text message merely confirms the opt-out request and does not include any marketing or promotional information, though contact information may be included in some circumstances. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 12:44 pm by Percipient Team
This means that deletion of a message, photo, or video does not delete the content from other sources (such as servers). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:55 am
Pullens, 281 Neb. 828, 800 N.W.2d 202 (Nebraska Supreme Court 2011), and held that emails could be “authenticated by evidence such as” the e-mail address[, t]he signature or name of the sender or recipient in the body of the e-mail, [e]vidence that an e-mail is a timely response to an earlier message addressed to the purported sender[, or] the contents of the e-mail and other circumstances [ [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
When does such third party behavior rise to the level of liability? [read post]
15 May 2013, 12:59 am by John Gregory
When does the risk (and responsibility) shift to the addressee? [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm by richards
Putting a sender or list on the safe list does not make any difference. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
The record does not indicate how long officers kept possession of the phone before giving it to Sawyer.Sawyer looked through the iPhone for about 5 or 10 minutes and saw a text message from a contact identified as `Z–Jon. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:18 am
We thus conclude that the general prohibition of the statute does not apply to the text message that [Warren] sent in this case. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:45 am by Ronald London
  First, the Commission emphasized that the ruling applies only when the text-message sender had previously obtained prior express consent from the consumer to receive text messages using an autodialer. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:38 am by Eric Goldman
Ephemeral messaging apps go a step beyond iMessage by automating the deletion of text messages on both the sender’s and the recipient’s devices after a short, preset time (30 seconds, 10 minutes, one hour, etc.). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:46 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
  In this enforcement action, the FTC does not argue that the defendant violated its Telemarketing Sales Rule. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 12:38 pm by George Ticoras, Esq.
While this decision does not apply to robocalls, it does seem to permit those in political campaigns to allow voice calls and text messages, taken from their databases, to be automatically made from technology not using a random or sequential number generator without fear of violating the TCPA. [read post]