Search for: "Doe v. Bruno"
Results 21 - 40
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2021, 6:53 am
[15] Thus, in Güzelyurtlu and Others v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:01 am
They are also of the view that the expert, Bruno Poulin, strayed beyond the proper scope of his expert evidence and that his testimony was neither relevant nor necessary within the meaning of R. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) leads a group of plaintiffs seeking to overturn Prop.22 in Castellanos v State of California (12 January 2021). [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
And yet, the choice for users to communicate in either form on most of these platforms does not necessarily mean that the technologies are nudging users in one direction. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
Does common law contract law provide an effective means of redress? [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:38 am
V. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
As Ericsson’s CEO noted, the PTS ban of Huawei and ZTE restricts free competition and trade and does not correspond to the EU toolbox guidelines.[18] In any event, even if the justification offered by the PTS is enough to meet the threshold of substantiation of a “genuine and sufficiently serious threat” required by Article 36 of the TFEU, the PTS decision would still not be justified under the public security derogation. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 3:59 pm
From Judge Joy Cossich Lobrano's opinion Monday in Bruno v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
This reasoning is surprising and arguably incorrect because the «notion of aid» loses its objective nature and becomes entirely dependent on the structure of Member States’ tax systems, in clear contrast with consolidated fiscal State aid case law.9)Court of Justice, 21 December 2016, Commission v World duty free group, Case C-20/15 P, ECLI:EU:C:2016:981, paras. 76 -79 «the selectivity of a tax measure can be established even if that measure does not… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:47 am
What is more, the vagueness of the stipulated criteria, as well as the fact that the risk assessment requirement does not apply horizontally – rather it is triggered at the request of a College Member for specific suppliers – highlight the discretionary nature of the process. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:35 pm
BAZINAS Does the World Need Another Uniform Law on Factoring? [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm
Calling profits normal does not make them normal. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
[iv] The General Court of EU in Hardware (Guangzhou) v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
This post is adapted from the author’s article ‘Phase One US-China Trade Deal: What Does It Mean for Intellectual Property? [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
Ojha, “Does the COVID-19 Outbreak form a Force Majeure Event: An Indian Perspective”. yet hardship clauses could prove to be more fitting, in particular when it comes to long-term contracts. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:15 am
Hearthside Baking, Scafom International BV v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:00 am
Puttaswamy v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:01 am
India unlike civil law countries like the United States[2], Germany[3] and France[4] does not codify the definition of force majeure into any legislation. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:18 am
A similar dispute arose later in the Djibouti v. [read post]
