Search for: "Doe v. C" Results 21 - 40 of 27,186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2016, 11:54 am
United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990)), does not apply when a 924(c) conviction is contemporaneous with the conviction for a crime of violence. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:51 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States, holding that section 924(c)'s requirement of consecutive sentences does not apply when conviction is under section 924(j). [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
A smiling TV 2 Norway (new owner of C More) CEO possibly pictured before the CJEU rulingLast week this blog reported on the latest decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the right of communication/making available to the public within Article 3 of the InfoSoc Directive, this being C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg, C-279/13.BackgroundAs readers will remember, this was yet another reference for a preliminary… [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am by Patricia Hughes
I suggest that while Bill C-7 satisfies the letter of Truchon, it does not satisfy the spirit. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:33 pm
On question 10, Doe wrote a “D” in the margin of his examination booklet; Student B wrote a large “C” in his margin; both Doe and Student B marked “C” on their Scantron® answer sheets. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:25 am by Yuanchung Lee
But a conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery does not qualify as a crime of violence for purposes of § 924(c), because United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by Bartolus
So held the Court in its judgment in Case C-3/09 Erotic Center BVBA v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 2:10 pm
It is the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-110/05 Commission v. [read post]