Search for: "Doe v. City of New York et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 453
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2019, 9:14 am
MoMA PS1, et al asserts claims under city law for gender, pregnancy, and caregiver discrimination. [read post]
26 Apr 2006, 12:56 pm
Philip Altholz, et al. v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:24 pm
CORP., ET AL. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:46 am
§§ 290 et seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law, NYC Admin. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:46 am
§§ 290 et seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law, NYC Admin. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 1:06 pm
Life Alert Emergency Response, Inc., et al., No. 154464/2015, complaint (N.Y. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 8:51 am
City of New York, et al., No. 22-491 (2nd Cir. 2024), held that a New York law protecting workers in the fast-food industry from arbitrary termination or reduction in hours was not preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) or unconstitutional pursuant to the dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:57 am
Omnicom Group, Inc., et al., No. 1:15-cv-03440, 1st am. complaint (S.D.N.Y., Jun. 22, 2015). [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:07 am
City of New York (08-969); Shady Grove Orthopedic Association v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Index No. 152332/22 Appeal No. 2379 Case No. 2022-05305 [*1]In the Matter of Yonathan Bonifacio, Petitioner-Appellant, v Keechant Sewell et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Index No. 152332/22 Appeal No. 2379 Case No. 2022-05305 [*1]In the Matter of Yonathan Bonifacio, Petitioner-Appellant, v Keechant Sewell et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:03 am
Dayal, et al, No. 1:11-cv-04170, complaint (S.D.N.Y., Jun. 20, 2011). [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:01 am
Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:59 am
Cuomo, et al., No. 15-4582, verif. petition (N.Y. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:03 am
Carter p/k/a Jay-Z, et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
” On November 24, 2009, the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in the matter of Daniel Goldstein et al vs. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:56 pm
This past week, in a 4 to 3 decision, New York’s highest court – the Court of Appeals – decided an important New York City land use question regarding how “open space” is accessed by residents on a zoning lot with multiple buildings In the Matter of Randy Peyton, et al v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:56 pm
This past week, in a 4 to 3 decision, New York’s highest court – the Court of Appeals – decided an important New York City land use question regarding how “open space” is accessed by residents on a zoning lot with multiple buildings In the Matter of Randy Peyton, et al v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 7:21 am
The case is entitled Ok et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 4:15 am
DeStefano, USSC, No. 07-1428, decided June 29, 2009 [Together with No. 08-328, Ricci et al. v. [read post]
