Search for: "Doe v. Griggs" Results 21 - 40 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2020, 3:31 am by SHG
Disparate impact isn’t proof of racism, but rather gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of racism because proof of racial animus is often hard to identify and so the Supreme Court in the 1971 case of Griggs v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Plainly, he does not, and presidents like Jefferson, FDR, and Reagan play important roles in his account. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 am
It stated that “this provision refers to the legal ownership of copyright: it does not affect the equitable ownership, or the right to call for an assignment of the legal title. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm
  Source: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/publications/the_101_201_practice_series/disparate_impact_unintentional_discrimination/ https://legaldictionary.net/griggs-v-duke-power-co/ https://newsone.com/3780050/racial-discrimination-shaving-facial-hair-razor-bumps-dreadlocks-african-americans/ https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2016-05-09Read More [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Kleber also cannot be easily reconciled with aspects of the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Griggs v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:52 am by SHG
Kleber urges a different conclusion in no small part on the basis of the Supreme Court’s 1971 decision in Griggs v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:21 pm by Jon
At the heart of the Ricci case was the doctrine of disparate-impact discrimination, which the Supreme Court first articulated in its 1971 decision in Griggs v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am by Gail Heriot
Consequently, liability for disparate impact essentially means that funding recipients must be prepared to justify virtually everything they do as "necessary" (as defined by Griggs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 3:28 pm by Jason Rantanen
Guest post by Timothy Holbrook, Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Law at Emory University School of Law. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:12 am by TARUNABH KHAITAN
If affirmed by the Supreme Court, this outcome could reverse a significant turn in Anglo-American discrimination law that started with the decision of the US Supreme Court in Griggs v Duke Power Company (1971). [read post]