Search for: "Doe v. Marten" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2011, 2:12 am by war
Philips v Remington and Dr Martens  were distinguished as the products themselves were labelled in the appropriate places (and the rival traders’ marks were well-known). [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm by Michael Oykhman
Mischief is a general intent crime and does not require the Crown to prove that you intended to bring about the specific consequences of your actions. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Victor Kattan
Secretary General, States, and competent U.N. bodies; drawing up a Statute for a permanent international penal tribunal for trying the crime of apartheid as envisaged by Article V of the Convention; and drawing attention to the role of transnational corporations in sustaining apartheid in Southern Africa. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The international legal community recognizes the same sources of international law as does the United States’ legal system. [read post]