Search for: "Doe v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County" Results 21 - 26 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Plaintiff-Appellant Brian Petty appeals the district court's summary judgment and judgment on partial findings in favor of Metropolitan Government of Nashville-Davidson County ("Metro") on claims that Metro violated his rights under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA"), 38 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:11 am
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, the Supreme Court has been asked to assess whether the anti-retaliation provisions under Title VII extend protection to employees who participate in an employer’s internal investigation. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by Joy Waltemath
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County that, when an employee internally communicates a belief that the employer has engaged in employment discrimination, that communication virtually always constitutes the employee’s opposition to the activity. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:58 am by Richard Renner
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, 555 U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 846 (2009). [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Metro Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 06-1595Title VII/retaliation: (From SCOTUSwiki): The Court unanimously concluded that the ordinary meaning of "oppose" includes giving a "disapproving account" of unlawful behavior, even if the employee takes no further action on her own to seek to stop or remedy the conduct. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Metropolitan Gov’t of Nashville and Davidson County, No. 06-1595, that the anti-retaliation provisions of Title VII extend to employees who take part in investigations even if that employee does not file a complaint of retaliation. [read post]