Search for: "Doe v. Regents of the University of California"
Results 21 - 40
of 317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
From today's California Court of Appeal opinion in Iloh v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
By Guest Bloggers Margaret Chon and Christine Haight Farley [Margaret Chon is a Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law, and Christine Haight Farley is a Professor of Law at American University Washington College of Law.] [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
Grutter also reaffirmed Justice Powell’s opinion announcing the judgment of a splintered Court in Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
The Supreme Court has historically permitted the limited use of race-based college admissions programs, beginning 45 years ago in the Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
In Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:48 pm
In its discussion of the merits, the opinion begins with a history of the Equal Protection Clause, including the clause’s history in the Court, and, among other things, quotes from the plurality opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
In 1977, in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm
The Supreme Court’s precedents on affirmative action dated back to 1978, when a divided Court came to a mixed decision in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
For the “overall” category—a composite of the five other ratings— a first reader can and does consider the applicant’s race. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
For the “overall” category—a composite of the five other ratings— a first reader can and does consider the applicant’s race. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
The Regents of the University of California/Hills Conservation Network v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 4:45 am
Recall that one of the key affirmative action precedents is Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:02 pm
The Regents of the University of California, et al. (2023) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
21 May 2023, 3:39 pm
Regents of University of California (2023) 88 Cal.App.5th 656, which held the University’s long-range campus development plan (LRDP) EIR inadequate, throwing a monkey wrench into its efforts to redevelop and build much-needed student and homeless housing at the historic People’s Park site. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
In Doe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
Regents of the Univ of California, SCOTUS held that the rescission was procedurally defective. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 1:36 pm
” The Court reached that decision on a plethora of prior judicial decisions such as Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
Regents of University of California (2020) [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 1:35 pm
Finally, our decision does not require the Regents to abandon the People’s Park project. [read post]
