Search for: "Doe v. SBM"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
Defendant argued that the order imposing lifetime SBM violated the Fourth Amendment, as the United States Supreme Court held that SBM is a search subject to the Fourth Amendment in Grady v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm
Reasonableness of SBM. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm
Reasonableness of SBM. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 7:53 am
Applying Hilton, the court explained that lifetime SBM does not represent an unreasonable search for aggravated offenders like defendant. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:53 pm
The trial court made findings as to the reasonableness of SBM in light of State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 7:41 am
Judge Murphy wrote that the 2020 SBM orders should be vacated, leaving 2012 SBM orders in place, as the trial court lacked appropriate jurisdiction under State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 5:00 am
There was uncertainty in the record as to which of two studies the trial court relied upon when ordering SBM and the Court of Appeals remanded for clarification of that issue State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
Where (as happened here) the State does not object, the Court of Appeals may exercise jurisdiction by granting the petitions for writ of certiorari. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
In its words: Defendant’s argument, however, rests on a speculative assessment of the facts precisely because the Record does not disclose how much time elapsed from the assault until the statements were made. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 am
State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:41 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:14 am
He would have held that North Carolina does have a good faith exception, pursuant to the 2011 amendment to G.S. 15A-974, which provides legislative authority for the exception that was lacking when State v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
A finding of no plain error does not preclude a finding of ineffective assistance of counsel State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
Notably, the reason does not have to be a reason that makes sense, but a reason that does not deny equal protection. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 8:12 am
FTC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
In addition, the State presented no evidence on the efficacy of SBM to reduce recidivism. [read post]
