Search for: "Doe v. School Administrative Dist. No. 19"
Results 21 - 40
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
It noted that the County certified an 850-page EIR, and that a lengthy, six-year administrative process preceded the EIR’s adoption. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:51 pm
Dist. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am
See, e.g., Doe I v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 8:46 am
From Spring v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 5:01 am
Central Valley School Dist. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Such an estimate, however, does not necessarily give a realistic prediction of the risk. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
After graduating from law school, I clerked for a year on the U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 4:45 pm
Allegheny School Dist. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
The court finds the Doe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Dist., 145 AD3d 1072, 1073 [citations and internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Dist., 145 AD3d 1072, 1073 [citations and internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
Governor, 760 F.3d 1195, 1218-19 (11th Cir. 2014) (applying rational basis review to a regulation prohibiting physicians from inquiring into patients' firearm ownership); Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
