Search for: "Doe v. Selective Service System"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
In Caperton v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 2:34 pm
Ctr. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:10 am
Healthnow New York Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:52 pm
The court rejected Culhane’s argument that MERS did not legally hold the mortgage so it could not assign it, reasoning that nothing in Massachusetts mortgage law prohibited splitting the note and mortgage as the MERS system does. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm
Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC, 175 AD3d 1, the clause does not state that it encompasses "any and all disputes" between the parties and it does not explicitly delegate the arbitrability question to an arbitrator and the CBA does not evince a clear and unmistakable intent to arbitrate the Labor Law claims at issue here. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:00 pm
Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC, 175 AD3d 1, the clause does not state that it encompasses "any and all disputes" between the parties and it does not explicitly delegate the arbitrability question to an arbitrator and the CBA does not evince a clear and unmistakable intent to arbitrate the Labor Law claims at issue here. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Education Law §3013(2) provides as follows: "Whenever a trustee, board of trustee, board of education or board of cooperative educational services abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Education Law §3013(2) provides as follows: "Whenever a trustee, board of trustee, board of education or board of cooperative educational services abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 9:02 am
In its memo supporting its motion to dismiss, the government reportedly cited the Rostker case and a a 1984 SCOTUS case — Selective Service System v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 1:18 pm
” Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Selection of an eligible from a list resulting from a competitive examination is typically based on the so-called “rule of three” currently set out in §61.1 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Selection of an eligible from a list resulting from a competitive examination is typically based on the so-called “rule of three” currently set out in §61.1 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 11:52 am
Florida (1970) the Court held that the Sixth Amendment does not require that a jury must consist of 12 jurors—it would later specify in Ballew v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:07 am
Here are selected slides summarizing a 2009 decision - Baker v. [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 12:47 pm
Those we forget: NEPA does not protect remote Alaska Native communities from exploitation by resource extraction companies. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:30 pm
The California supreme court in Donohue v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:07 am
Susan V. [read post]
25 May 2022, 1:52 pm
” In Facebook v. [read post]