Search for: "Doe v. University of Cincinnati" Results 21 - 40 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
According to a WCPO Cincinnati report, the Ohio Supreme Court has passed new legislation shifting the cost of malpractice judgments from doctors’ insurers to the taxpayers.What does this mean for patients? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:37 am by Tom Kosakowski
Related posts: University of Cincinnati Ombuds Office Marks Four Decades of Service; Video Introduces University of Cincinnati Ombuds Office. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 11:03 am
Adam Steinman (University of Cincinnati - College of Law) has posted What is the Erie Doctrine? [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:18 am by MBettman
Priya Walia is a rising 2L at the University of Cincinnati College of Law and is interning this summer at the Ohio Justice & Policy Center. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm by Alexander S. Conn
University of Cincinnati Law Professor Sean Mangan does not hate many things, but ‘and/or’ has to be first on the list – along with whomever might be playing his Irish that weekend. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm by Alexander S. Conn
University of Cincinnati Law Professor Sean Mangan does not hate many things, but ‘and/or’ has to be first on the list – along with whomever might be playing his Irish that weekend. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 6:02 am
Thomas (University of Cincinnati College of Law) has posted Why the Motion to Dismiss is Now Unconstitutional on SSRN. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:10 am by MBettman
Last year Caitlin Graham Felvus, a 2014 graduate of the University of Cincinnati College of Law, wrote an article for the University of Cincinnati Law Review on the Miller decision entitled “Advancement of Legal Fees May be More Than Corporations Bargained For: Miller v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 10:16 am by MBettman
Jennifer Dollard, a third year law student at the University of Cincinnati College of Law, and an associate member of the Law Review, has written a casenote  titled “Unintended Effects and Inadequate Consumer Benefit: Analyzing Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. [read post]