Search for: "Does 1 - 37"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2007, 9:54 pm
Brady, The Legal IntelligencerRule 37(f) is a new rule added by the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that became effective Dec. 1, 2006. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:48 am
Does 1-37, CV 11-3995 (E.D.N.Y.) [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 8:44 pm
§ 41.121(a)(1) and S.O. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:47 am
Apple sought sanctions against Samsung pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2) in two separate motions pertaining to alleged violations of discovery orders, including an order regarding discovery on damages. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
(Also Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and another v Conversant Wireless Licensing SÁRL [2020] UKSC 37 and ZTE Corporation and another v Conversant Wireless Licensing SÁRL [2020] UKSC 37) On appeal from: [2019] EWCA Civ 38 1.This appeal discusses whether the English court has the power or jurisdiction, or is it a proper exercise of any such power or jurisdiction without the parties’ agreement: to grant an injunction restraining infringement of a… [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 10:23 am
As numbers go, 37 isn’t as famous as, say, 1 or 13. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:22 am
The common law duty of disclosure is based on fairness but fairness does not require the same level of disclosure at every stage of the process. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
APP argues in its briefs (here and here) that there are two reasons why AIA Section 37 does not save MDCO’s PTE request for the ‘404 patent, but rather confirms that the PTE application was untimely, and that as such, the Federal Circuit should reverse Judge Hilton’s decision and deem the ‘404 patent to have expired as of March 23, 2010: (1) Section 37 will not go into effect until [September 16, 2012]. [read post]
30 May 2009, 10:19 am
Governor Bill Richardson and the New Mexico Office of Recovery and Reinvestment have announced $37 million US funding from the U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 1:44 pm
Vanlandingham, 37 Fla.L.Weekly D2354 (1st DCA) Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 1:44 pm
Vanlandingham, 37 Fla.L.Weekly D2354 (1st DCA) Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:03 am
State, 18 So. 3d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 22 So. 3d 539 (Fla. 2009)), certifying the conflict to the Florida Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:44 pm
Rule 37(e)(1) provides that the court, “upon finding prejudice to another party from loss of the information, may order measures no greater than necessary to cure the prejudice. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:22 pm
And how does it work in California? [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
See § 1.116(b)(1)–(3). [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 12:04 am
The submission must be served upon the applicant in accordance with 37 CFR 1.248 prior to the filing of the submission in the Office.To ensure that a third-party submission under 37 CFR 1.99 does not amount to a protest or pre-grant opposition without express consent of the applicant, the third party does not have the right to insist that the examiner consider any of the patents or publications submitted. [read post]
20 Jun 2005, 5:31 am
2 (37). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:36 am
In addition, these internal rules overlap with 37 C.F.R. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
"The Right to Know campaign collected nearly 1 million signatures for the initiative, virtually doubling California's 550,000-signature requirement. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 9:13 am
Wilson : Motion Hearing held on 9/25/2007 re [14] MOTION for protective order or in thealternative to quash ex parte subpoena filed by Doe #37, Doe #21. [read post]
