Search for: "Does 1-23"
Results 21 - 40
of 14,285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
Battaglia, No. 1:14-CV-49 (W.D. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 7:52 am
In the Supreme Court category, why does Scalia outrank Thomas, why does Roberts come in only third, and why does Alito get no respect? [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:00 am
, on July 23, 2013 at 1:00 PM – 2:30 PM ET or 11:00 AM -... [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:50 pm
23-10246 (Jan. 2, 2024). [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 4:21 pm
Does 1-4, after the university advised the Court that it could not identify John Does #8, 9, and 14 to a reasonable degree of technical certainty, Judge Nancy Gertner deemed the letter a motion to quash, and granted it, quashing the subpoena as to those defendants:The Court treats Boston University's 9/23/08 Letter as a Motion to Quash and GRANTS the motion with respect to Doe Defendants # 8, 9, and 14. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:07 pm
The post Unocal Claim Does not Satisfy Rule 23.1 appeared first on Delaware Corporate & Commercial Litigation Blog. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:12 am
Bergeson On January 23, 2020, the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:10 am
Therefore the case gets a unique numbering and the official Case Number appears to be "Art 23 1/15".Merpel's link does not point to the actual document as issued by the Enlarged Board, but rather to a slightly transmoggified version. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 11:43 am
From the Oregon Supreme Court:"For those reasons, effective April 1, 2007, the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals on the court's own motion will strike any motion that does not comply with the titling requirements of ORAP 7.10(1)(b), (c), and (d), with leave to refile in compliance with those requirements. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 8:40 am
The appellant, Santonio McCoy, was convicted under Section 571.070.1(1) [text] making it illegal for offenders convicted of prior felonies to possess firearms and appealed arguing it violated the Missouri Constitution's right to bear arms as provided by Article 1, Section 23 [text]. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:08 pm
Does 1-4. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
We suggest three key practices How Nonprofit Leadership Development Sustains Organizations and Their Teams Vox: What does it mean to give away a $120 billion fortune? [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
On Jan. 23, the district court declined to enjoin transfer entirely. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 12:46 pm
As we discussed last month, the CSA recently introduced proposed amendments to NI 23-103 Electronic Trading to impose requirements on participant dealers that provide direct electronic access and address the fact that the instrument, which comes into effect on March 1, 2013, does not currently include requirements regarding the provision of DEA. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 4:54 am
The following guidance has recently been published by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO).Requests for personal data about public authority employees (Version 1.1, 25/10/2012)The course of justice and inquiries exception (regulation 12(5)(b)) (Version 1, 12/10/2012)Requests formulated in too general a manner (regulation 12(4)(c)) (Version 1, 11/10/2012)Freedom of Information legislation and research information: guidance for the higher education sector (Version 3,… [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:43 am
Why does this class certification contradict Federal Rule 23? [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
On June 23, 2023, the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 1:00 am
References & Supplemental Materials:“Senator Whitehouse introduces new version of Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act,” Senate.gov, 2/9/23“Legal ethics experts agree: Justice Thomas must recuse in insurrection cases,” NPR, 3/30/22“At the Supreme Court, Ethics Questions Over a Spouse’s Business Ties,” NYT, 1/31/23Dobbs leak report, Supreme Court, 1/19/23 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 1:00 am
References & Supplemental Materials:“Senator Whitehouse introduces new version of Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act,” Senate.gov, 2/9/23“Legal ethics experts agree: Justice Thomas must recuse in insurrection cases,” NPR, 3/30/22“At the Supreme Court, Ethics Questions Over a Spouse’s Business Ties,” NYT, 1/31/23Dobbs leak report, Supreme Court, 1/19/23 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:40 am
Circuit for review.The case is No. 23-60216 (Barr) and No. 23-1121 (Doe). [read post]
