Search for: "Does 1-3 v. Chandler"
Results 21 - 40
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
County of Nassau, 86 NY2d 42)].This Doctrine, and a number of other significant public personnel law issues including the establishment of positions in the Classified Service by a political subdivision of the State, jurisdictional classification of positions in the Classified Service and the impact of a Taylor Law agreement in the event there is layoff of employees in the Labor Class, were considered by the Appellate Division in Chandler v Village of Spring Valley, 104 AD3d… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
County of Nassau, 86 NY2d 42)].This Doctrine, and a number of other significant public personnel law issues including the establishment of positions in the Classified Service by a political subdivision of the State, jurisdictional classification of positions in the Classified Service and the impact of a Taylor Law agreement in the event there is layoff of employees in the Labor Class, were considered by the Appellate Division in Chandler v Village of Spring Valley, 104 AD3d… [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:21 am
Chandler v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:13 pm
Chandler, of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati — the former Delaware Chancellor — argued that Section 102(b)(1) has always been interpreted broadly to mean “for the management of the business”, even when that involves “intra-corporate” matters such as stock sales. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:25 pm
Chandler, 458 F. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm
The Press Gazette has coverage as does INFORRM. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:59 am
I directed my colleague to look at Chandler v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:27 am
” Id. at 1. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
The trial court (1) denied the no-evidence motion for summary judgment as to Agar's claims for civil conspiracy; (2) granted the no-evidence motion in favor of Electro "as to all other claims [by Agar] alleging direct liability;" and (3) granted "a traditional summary judgment on Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Electro Circuits International, LLC and Suresh Parikh only on the limited basis as to [their] . . . affirmative defense of statute of… [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Press Gazette has commentary, as does the Guardian and INFORRM. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:52 pm
I am delighted to set out below some thoughts on a recently published book on corporate social responsibility (CSR). [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:29 pm
" Chandler v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
§ 1292(a)(1). [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:22 am
He then relied on several well-known English cases to derive basic principles for the imposition of such duty of care on the parent company: (1) The three-part test of foreseeability, proximity and reasonableness set out in Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman constitutes a starting point of the analysis; 2) A duty of care may be owed, in appropriate circumstances, to the employees of the parent company and those directly affected by the subsidiary’s operations; 3) Such a… [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
See Unifund CCR Partners v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 10:26 am
Gillespie v National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-3, No. 02-16-00124-CV (Tex.App. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
The Gillespies objected to portions of Chandler's affidavit as inadmissible hearsay. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm
The omission was clearly an intra vires error but, in my view, that does not mean it falls within the slip rule. [read post]
