Search for: "Does 1-30 defendants" Results 21 - 40 of 7,859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2024, 6:59 pm by Benson Varghese
For example, if the claimant is 30% at fault, they can only recover 70% of their damages. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:59 pm by Benson Varghese
For example, if the claimant is 30% at fault, they can only recover 70% of their damages. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:59 pm by Benson Varghese
For example, if the claimant is 30% at fault, they can only recover 70% of their damages. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am by Stuart Kaplow
” But on May 1, 2024, the Ninth Circuit granted the government’s requested extraordinary remedy. [read post]
10 May 2024, 11:26 am by 1p21.admin
A victim of child sexual abuse, however, has until he or she is 30 years old to file a claim. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff does not dispute that much of the damage to his home resulted from negligent workmanship by his contractors, Sun Dragon Industries and Sandro Darsin. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor does plaintiff’s assertion about defendants’ alleged breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing rescue her breach of contract cause of action. [read post]
5 May 2024, 6:44 pm
While Hong Kong’s ratification to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) occurred in 1976 during the colonial era as the United Kingdom’s ratification was extended to the then dependent territory, Annex I, Section XIV of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration and Article 39 of Hong Kong’s Basic Law legally guarantee that the ICCPR remains in force in Hong Kong since the end of the colonial era on 1 July 1997. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
According to that archive, the supposedly "original" blogspot post purports to have been published Jan. 30, 2024, more than three weeks before the Fourth Circuit opinion (which the post quotes) was released. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am by husovec
There are number of intersting issues there, such as the interpretation of Articles 23, 30, 34 vs. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Many judges defend these events as helpful forums to discuss important issues, and they reject criticism that a stay at a fancy hotel could influence their decisions. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am by Eric Goldman
Note 1: As I have lamented before, yes, FOSTA cases are routinely this baroque and confusing. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Melissa Tremblay
Department of Justice and the whistleblowers’ bar.[1] In its U.S. ex rel. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Chan, J.) entered on or about April 8, 2022, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the motion of defendant 316 Bowery Realty Corp. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:19 am by SHG
Criminal contempt is punishable by a fine not exceeding $ 1 ,000, by jail not exceeding 30 days or by both in the discretion of the court, for each violation of a court order. [read post]