Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
As the case was pending discretionary review from the New Mexico Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court issued its Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
§ 1, cl. 1, likewise vests the executive Power in “the President of the United States of America. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:26 pm
” The implication should be obvious, while a Governor (or the president of the United States) has the inherent authority to remove or reassign people they appoint to office, a Governor (or the president of the United States) does not have the authority to remove, or assume the responsibilities of, a constitutionally elected officer except as provided for in the constitution. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
S. 420, 425, 427 (1984) (quoting United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Whitaker, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Washington, DC (Richard P. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
Satterberg, Prosecuting Attorney, and Andrea R. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
1. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
§ 1225(a)(1), (a)(3), (b)(2)(A). [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
1. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
[1] Ohio in The State of Ohio v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:41 pm
Apte v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:20 am
On June 23, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Bullcoming v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm
” United States v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:01 am
”); United States v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
Given Vaz’s allegation that EOIR failed to perform mandatory duties specified by federal regulation, his suit arose under the laws of the United States. [read post]
