Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office" Results 21 - 40 of 1,964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
§ 953: Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States,… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:29 pm by Shea Denning
Blakeney endorsed the Third Circuit’s articulation of this concept in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
In addition, it would allow lawsuits by “The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer” to file lawsuits challenging the release of aliens in alleged violation of INA § 236 and various other sections of law relating to immigration. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The EO makes clear that it does not establish generalized data localization requirements to store bulk sensitive personal data or United States Government-related data within the United States or to locate computing facilities used to process bulk sensitive personal data or United States Government-related data within the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am by Josh Blackman
Special Counsel Smith does not hold an "office," and he is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As a result, on April 24, 2023, in a telephone call between Sebco and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the latter indicted that [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Fink avers that he does not conduct surveillance, investigate crimes done or threatened against the United States, attempt to locate lost or stolen property, investigate the causes of fires or other property damage, carry a weapon, or operate under a pseudonym. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
The Final Rule specifically identifies and describes the following factors as relevant to the economic reality standard: 1. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
§§11–113(1), 14–1101(1), 14–1201, 14–1203(2)(a), 14–1204 (2023).After a five-day trial, the state District Court found thatformer President Trump had “engaged in insurrection”within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied therespondents’ petition. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Green, 411 U.S. 792," Plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case of Title VII discrimination'by showing that:"(1) she is a member of a protected class;"(2) she is qualified for her position;"(3) she suffered an adverse employment action; and"(4) the circumstances give rise to an inference of discrimination. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Green, 411 U.S. 792," Plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case of Title VII discrimination'by showing that:"(1) she is a member of a protected class;"(2) she is qualified for her position;"(3) she suffered an adverse employment action; and"(4) the circumstances give rise to an inference of discrimination. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Based on this conclusion, Blackman and Tillman “contend that the phrase ‘officer of the United States’ has the same meaning in Section 3 as it does in the Constitution of 1788. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
II, § 1, cl. 1; and although he was an officer in that capacity; and although the office for which he took his oath was “the Office of President of the United States,” Art. [read post]