Search for: "Does 1-96" Results 21 - 40 of 2,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2014, 6:56 am by Lawrence Kasperek
“CPL 190.50 (5) (a) does not mandate a specific time period for notice; rather, ‘reasonable time’ must be accorded to allow a defendant an opportunity to consult with counsel and decide whether to testify before a [g]rand [j]ury” (People v Sawyer, 96 NY2d 815, 816, rearg denied 96 NY2d 928). [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In this opposition appeal case Board 3.3.02 had to decide on the novelty of claim 1 as granted, which read:1. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:56 am
On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred (1) in concluding that it could not seek a declaratory judgment against Sampson because General Statutes § 8-200 (a) does not confer aggrievement on the plaintiff as a contract purchaser under an executory contract of sale; (2) in denying it a permanent injunction enjoining Bridgeport from conveying title to a parcel of land located at 22-96 Williston Street, hereinafter referred to as the Williston Street parcel,… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:30 am by David Fagundes
Aaron Perzanowski, Consumer Perceptions of the Right to Repair, 96 Ind. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
John's Law Review , Vol. 96, No. 3, 2022).Patricia Wiater, Not Who but What Can Hold Human Rights? [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 2:08 am
(5) If repeated and systematic re-utilisation is a requirement, (a) what does “systematic” mean? [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 2:28 pm
(5) If repeated and systematic re-utilisation is a requirement, (a) what does “systematic” mean? [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 6:47 pm by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
The case arose when the plaintiff’s car crashed into a logging truck while they were both traveling on Highway 96. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 9:16 pm by Bill Marler
Sick people range in age from less than 1 to 96 years, with a median age of 73, and 61% are female. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
T 0455/13 (Tolperisone/Sanochemia) confirmed that, purity does not confer novelty failing the exceptional circumstances defined in T 0990/96 (r. 3.9).However, a decision of the TBA last year indicated that the special criteria for assessing the novelty of purity may be losing favour in a similar fashion to that of the “purposive selection” test. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thus the parallel treatment of at least 24, preferably at least 48 and most preferably 96 samples or more […], which is disclosed in the description of the impugned patent, does not limit claim 1. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:08 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
" (Para 19, P. 24).Justice Ramana's opinion also touches on this topic in many places but does not explicitly note the contradiction between the approaches in these judgments (Patel Engineering &  Booz Allen) noted above. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 12:55 am
It is about a reference from Germany's Bundesgerichtshof concerning international jurisdiction for Community trade mark infringement and unfair competition actions, respectively under [now] Article 96(5) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation 207/2009 (CTMR) and Article 5(3) of the Regulation 44/2001(Brussels 1). [read post]