Search for: "Does I Through XX" Results 21 - 40 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2011, 3:35 pm
(In order to understand fully how the analysis produces its results, I highly recommend that those who have the time run through this interactive simulation of the process of gel electrophoresis in the lab.) [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:46 am by Simon Lester
"  But, relying on certain aspects of the jurisprudence, he thinks it can be done in a way that does not violate Article I:1: it would be easy for a WTO Panel to find a tariff conditioned on a non-product related PPM to be inconsistent with the GATT, but this does not mean that it must. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 11:18 am
Even if Sitglitz does not attempt to distinguish legally the various strategies that he suggests, such is not his purpose, it is however easy to recognize them through the text of his article. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 2:06 pm by Simon Lester
I haven't gone through on every word of the U.S. submissions in the DS597 dispute, but I did see a couple other comments from them on the issue of applying Article XXI outside the context of the GATT. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 2:06 pm by Simon Lester
I haven't gone through on every word of the U.S. submissions in the DS597 dispute, but I did see a couple other comments from them on the issue of applying Article XXI outside the context of the GATT. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 2:32 am
    The CJEU effectively killed as correct law the OHIM-espoused equivalence of the class XX heading wording and “All goods in class XX”. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:42 am by Roger Alford
What I find amazing in every discussion I have seen about Article XX is the failure to read the general exceptions in their context. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
  Here, the Court held that the FAA does not allow courts to invalidate a class arbitration waiver through the effective vindication exception. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:33 am by Simon Lester
Unlike many of the paragraphs in Article XX of the GATT 1994 and XIV of the GATS, which specify that the measure must be "necessary" for achieving the legitimate objective, Paragraph 2(a) does not require that the measure should be the least trade restrictive means to achieve the stated objective. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 5:25 am by SHG
I avoided using the name of the male senior, because after the verdict, should he be acquitted, he would remain innocent and should be able to go through the rest of his life without the taint of this charge. [read post]
It provides that only MA holders of drugs approved through the NDA pathway (which, as a rule, are the reference-listed ones) are allowed to request approval for including new therapeutic indications (Annex I, Item 11). [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 5:08 am by Simon Lester
I don't have a sense at this point of how much liberalization is involved in this agreement, but skimming through the various chapters, I found a number of tidbits worth noting. 1. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 10:39 pm
Every state codifies their sex offense laws by defining the different types of sex offenses that are committed, hence, recognizing the differences in sex offenders.If states used the Broad" form of "sex offender" they would only need one statute, one that says, you committed a sex offense and the punishment is xx, there would not be any further breakdown of sex offenses.Accordingly, McCain's S-431 uses the "Broad form Sex Offenders" so that EVIDENCE will not be… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 10:39 am
None of the Nice class heading wording actually covers 100% of its class content, but they are mostly quite broad listings with some, I imagine, coming tantalisingly close to “All goods in class XX”. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 9:50 am
(In order to understand fully how the analysis produces its results, I highly recommend that those who have the time run through this interactive simulation of the process of gel electrophoresis in the lab.) [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 5:02 pm by Simon Lester
I see no textual reason for Article XX to apply differently to violations of Article III as opposed to Article. [read post]