Search for: "Does I through Doe III"
Results 21 - 40
of 6,878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2017, 5:30 am
The new policy does away with these holds, making the denial of application immediate. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 6:22 am
It's an interesting point, and I'll write a separate post responding to it after I'm through with... [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:19 pm
WARNING WARNING WARNING....life insurance does not (and should not) go through your estate....usually. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
This two-part blog post series will summarize the provisions of Title I, the Musical Works Modernization Act (or MWM Act) and Title III, the Allocation for Music Producers Act (or AMP Act). [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
[iii] S.I. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:36 pm
III. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 1:45 pm
The citizens of Texas, through our representatives have made a legal bad thing out of drunk driving, because of the awful real-world thing (dead people) that results. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
A legally marketed device, as described in 21 CFR 807.92(a)(3), is a device that was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976 (preamendments device), for which a PMA is not required, or a device which has been reclassified from Class III to Class II or I, or a device which has been found SE through the 510(k) process. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am
The Act does not specify how the Collective is to harmonize “transparency” with “confidentiality. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 6:45 am
iii) the company, faced with a request from a customer asking for a signature (or at least asking why there wasn’t one)? [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:57 am
Ben Witherington III's light-bulb jokes, in case you missed them from his excellent site, benwitherington.blogspot.com:"How many Presbyterians does it take to change alight bulb? [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:58 pm
Parts I and II provided you with tips on how to get your site up and running, now in Part III, you will learn how to measure the success of your site. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:30 am
That case referred to express indemnity classifications as Type I, II, or III. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm
" Birss LJ Birss LJ summarised the grounds of appeal into three questions ([27]):i) Does the 1977 Act require that an inventor be a person? [read post]
13 May 2018, 3:43 pm
In a personal injury case, the plaintiff must put forth evidence demonstrating that (i) the defendant was negligent, (ii) the defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries, and (iii) the plaintiff has suffered cognizable damages. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
How does CARES Act III compare to CARES Act I and II? [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm
Challenges Dressed Up as LawThe refusal of certain MNAs in Quebec to take the oath of office to King Charles III is an example of ignoring the constitution, but justifying it unilaterally through legal process. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
I. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
(citing §164.508(b)(3)(iii)).So much for the gobbledygook. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:26 pm
I’m not currently aware of any cases that look like that, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see one come up through the courts in the next few years. [read post]
