Search for: "Dolan v. Land" Results 21 - 40 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 2:48 pm by Mark Murakami
City of West Linn • Question:  Do the “essential nexus” and “rough proportionality” tests from Nollan and Dolan apply to exactions of personal property – in this case, cash – for discretionary land use permits? [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:54 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
West Linn Corporate Park LLC v City of West Linn, No. 11-299 (petition for cert. filed Sep. 6, 2011), a petition we've been following that asked whether the nexus and "rough proportionality" tests for a regulatory taking in Nollan and Dolan are limited to government demands for land, has been denied. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm by Richard Frank
Seven years later, in Dolan v City of Tigard, the Court returned to its newly-minted “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 9:35 am
  In July 2008, the court held that the plaintiff's Nollan/Dolan claims are takings claims that are not ripe under Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]