Search for: "Doma"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2022, 1:52 pm
If RMA passes, it would be a milestone for a nation that once rushed to pass DOMA--emergency legislation barring recognition before a single same-sex marriage even existed. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Windsor, the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of DOMA, which defines marriage solely as consisting of a union of one man and one woman. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court ruled DOMA unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:22 pm
DOMA purported to allow states to deny recognition; the new law requires them to give recognition. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm
United States (2013) arguing that the earlier Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) - which, enacted a federal definition of marriage limited to opposite-sex couples - exceeded the scope of congressional power. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:47 pm
Once again, Justice Kennedy assured everyone that striking down DOMA would not put in jeopardy traditional marriage laws. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 3:46 am
"Attiecīgi un pretēji priekšstatam, ka "patiesība" ir mērķis zinātnē vai citur, cilvēki tādējādi faktiski pieturas pie dotas idejas, domas skolas, kultūras prakses vai reliģijas , jo konkrētas mēmas piekritēji to uztver kā tādu, kas nodrošina tās turētājus tas mēms ar priekšrocībām. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 8:18 am
El tribunal Supremo sale al paso de las escurridizas pruebas psicotécnicas y su valoración por los tribunales calificadores de los procedimientos selectivos, campo que se ha movido entre lo críptico y lo opaco, y fija doctrina casacional en la importante Sentencia de la Sala tercera de 27 de enero de 2022 (rec.8179/2019). [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:06 am
“At Doma, we pride ourselves in the fact that we are breaking through the barriers that have held back the title insurance industry for centuries,” King says. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:06 am
“At Doma, we pride ourselves in the fact that we are breaking through the barriers that have held back the title insurance industry for centuries,” King says. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 6:33 am
After leaving the White House in January 2017, Harris was the general counsel and chief business officer at DOMA, Inc., which provides title insurance and settlement services. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:48 pm
Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of “marriage” and “spouse” to apply only to heterosexual unions, by Section 3 of the defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 7:34 am
General Counsel, Office of the Inspector General (Washington, DC) (1/14) Deputy General Counsel, Sysmex (Chicago, IL) (1/14) General Counsel, quip (New York, NY) (1/14) General Counsel, Egnyte (Mountain View, CA) (1/14) … [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 6:39 pm
Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of “marriage” and “spouse” to apply only to heterosexual unions, by Section 3 of the defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 2:50 am
Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of “marriage” and “spouse” to apply only to heterosexual unions, by Section 3 of the defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 10:06 am
(now DOMA), which provides title insurance and settlement services in a number of state throughout the nation. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 10:06 am
(now DOMA), which provides title insurance and settlement services in a number of state throughout the nation. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:34 am
Windsor and the Defeat of DOMA. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:04 pm
Further, when the Court does strike down federal laws or overturn prior precedents, it does not do so in a uniformly conservative direction, as cases such as Windsor (invalidating DOMA) and Obergefell (overturning Baker v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:05 pm
Supreme Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of “marriage” and “spouse” to apply only to heterosexual unions, by Section 3 of the defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
