Search for: "Dorman, in Re" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2010, 7:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(Sample statement: “[I]f a technician goes to a name brand, whether it's Dayco, which is ours, or Federal Mogul, or Gates, our competition, they can assure themselves that they're going to get a good quality product. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
    Please Join: New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn New York State Senator Tom Duane New York State Assembly Members  Deborah Glick, Micah Kellner and Matt Titone New York City Council Members Daniel Dromm, Rosie Mendez and Jimmy Van Bramer New York State Democratic Party Vice Chair Emily Giske New York State Committee Member Rachel Lavine District Leaders Mary Dorman, Brad Hoylman, Tom Schuler and Frank Wilkinson, Greg Lambert, Liz Abzug,… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
PLMIC, LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) Applicant’s policing efforts lead to TTAB reversal of mere descriptiveness refusal of PERFECTING SERUM for skin moisturizer: In re Murad, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB finds HEALTH HOME VACUUM not merely descriptive for vacuum cleaners: Oreck Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
PLMIC, LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) Applicant’s policing efforts lead to TTAB reversal of mere descriptiveness refusal of PERFECTING SERUM for skin moisturizer: In re Murad, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB finds HEALTH HOME VACUUM not merely descriptive for vacuum cleaners: Oreck Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 9:48 pm
Thanks to Lynn Dorman (@lynndorman) in my twitter network for the head's up on this article. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 2:47 pm
It is interesting to note that only one stranger offense against a child was reported in the year after the law took effect (Todd Dorman, "Analyst: Data doesn't support sex offender rule. [read post]