Search for: "Douglas v. Smith*" Results 21 - 40 of 407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Wolff, Cogency, Seriousness, Cohesion, and Importance: Assessing the Strasbourg Case-Law on Religion or Belief, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 2023, 00, 1–20).Douglas Mulliken, “It’s not just money; you are investing in your identity”: Israel, the Jewish Diaspora, and the Israel Bonds Program, (May 11, 2023).Dimitry Gegenava, Insults to Religious Feelings v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 98 (forthcoming 2023)).Simrin Chowdhury, The Economic Implications of Roe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
On 1 November 2022, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
Brennan J wrote the opinion of the Court, in which Warren CJ, and Clark, Harlan, Stewart and White JJ joined; Black J wrote a short concurring opinion; Goldberg J concurred in the result; and Douglas J concurred with both Black and Goldberg JJ. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
Equity's concern with the protection of information can be seen as far back as 1818 and the canonical case of Gee v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:47 am by Samuel Bray
That is a super-timely question--see Whole Women's Health v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Facility Warden, 112 AD3d 1350, 1351 [4th Dept 2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 864 [2014]), and it "is not of the type that typically evades review" (Wisholek v Douglas, 97 NY2d 740, 742 [2002]). [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Facility Warden, 112 AD3d 1350, 1351 [4th Dept 2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 864 [2014]), and it "is not of the type that typically evades review" (Wisholek v Douglas, 97 NY2d 740, 742 [2002]). [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:45 am by Howard Friedman
Another Paper Attempting to Reconcile Abortion Jurisprudence and the Doctrine of Precedent Considering Dobbs v. [read post]