Search for: "Downing v. Kingsley"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
The “Sister Wives” family challenged the law (represented by George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley), and a federal district court in Utah struck the law down on free exercise clause grounds, largely reasoning that the law was motivated by hostility to polygamist Mormons. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:18 am
In Kingsley v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:40 am
At IMLA’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen breaks down the decision in Kingsley v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
At Nahmod Law, Sheldon Nahmod weighs in on the decision in Kingsley v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Today, a divided Court resolved Kingsley v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 12:30 pm
Breyer has another five-to-four decision, with the opinion in Kingsley v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:06 am
Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court in Kingsley v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
That is constitutional for junkyards, but, no, people are not the same as wrecked cars.The second case is Kingsley v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm
Newspapers, Journalism and regulation Alan Rusbridger has stepped down from his role as Guardian editor, handing over to deputy editor Katharine Viner. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:34 pm
Today, the Court heard argument in Kingsley v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
Kingsley v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:43 am
" is the question posed by the title of a fascinating interdisciplinary conference that is coming up down towards the bottom left corner of the British Isles in the lovely and ancient city of Exeter. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
And Kingsley v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
The sentences were handed down on Friday 4 July 2014 and received rather limited media coverage. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
I have received additional impressions on Iskanian from attorney Eric Kingsley of Kingsley & Kingsley in Encino. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
My sincere thanks to Eric Kingsley of Kingsley & Kingsley in Encino for attending the argument and taking the time to summarize it for us. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:10 pm
"The Strange World of IP Consents", launched on Friday afternoon as the fourth item down in the IPKat's Friday Fantasies feature, already has over 50 people registered. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:18 pm
In the second case, Starbucks (UK) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc & Others [2012] EWHC 1842 (Ch) (on which see "No coffee in sight, but Starbucks speeds to trial", guested by Kingsley Egbuonu here), Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, had a slightly different set of facts and reached an entirely different conclusion. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:54 am
In the second case, Starbucks (UK) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc & Others [2012] EWHC 1842 (Ch) (on which see "No coffee in sight, but Starbucks speeds to trial", guested by Kingsley Egbuonu here), Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, had a slightly different set of facts and reached an entirely different conclusion. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
This is Kingsley's account of the decision in question: A few days after the decision in EMI (IP) Ltd and others v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and another [2012] EWHC 1644 (Ch), reported here by the IPKat, Mr Justice Arnold handed down this judgment in Starbucks (UK) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc & Others [2012] EWHC 1842 (Ch).This decision is also not a “big, precedent-packed blockbuster” --as seasoned and revered readers… [read post]
