Search for: "Dublin v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44] per Lord Carswell,… [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:23 pm
Specifically, we will cover United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
Concerned Dublin Citizens, et al. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:37 am
He testified that the Irish District Court for the Dublin Metropolitan District served Respondent in the United States with notice of the hearing on the application. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
Some have set up offices in different jurisdictions: Eaton Vance, Standard Life Aberdeen, and Legal & General have all set up offices in Dublin. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:14 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:34 am
Yesterday, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the United States Government in the case Microsoft v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 4:32 pm
Facebook Ireland, located in Dublin, is responsible for processing the data for Facebook users outside of the United States and Canada. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 3:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Bd. of Revision, 140 Ohio St.3d 248, 2014-Ohio-3620, 17 N.E.3d 537; and Dublin City Schools Bd.of Edn. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 8:30 am
United States Drug Enforcement Agency, 2007 U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm
When the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled in the case of Kelo v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:52 am
The secretary of state decided to remove him to Italy under Regulation 343/2003 (Dublin II). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
Board of Trustees.)EXEMPTIONS Residential Project Based Upon A Previously Approved Specific Plan is Exempt From Later CEQA Review Concerned Dublin Citizens v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Cablevision of Michigan, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Cablevision of Michigan, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am
| US Supreme Court rules Official Georgia Codes Annotated is ineligible for copyright protection - Georgia v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
Accordingly, based on the `country code’ the customer enters at registration, Microsoft may migrate the account to the datacenter in Dublin. . . .When this is done, all content and most noncontent information associated with the account is deleted from servers in the United States. . . .The non-content information that remains in the United States when an account is migrated abroad falls into three categories. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
Fun with fundamentals, US-styleRight: the seal of the United States Patent and Trademark OfficeThe IPKat, still behind with his Christmas reading, has at last had the chance to examine Fundamentals of United States Intellectual Property Law: Copyright, Patent, Trademark, the second edition of which was published by Kluwer Law International towards the close of 2006. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
Transition without change: taxation by the Irish Free StateEmer Hunt (University College Dublin, Ireland)14. [read post]
