Search for: "Duke v. SUPERIOR COURT" Results 21 - 40 of 261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2021, 10:21 am by Eugene Volokh
The Illinois Superior Court recently rejected Clearview's motion to dismiss argument that the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) impermissibly infringes its First Amendment rights. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
The Statement in Open Court [pdf] in the case of Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers received wide coverage. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am by Chris Seaton
Anyway, all of this culminated with the Supreme Court refusing to make this Bush v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 10:40 am by Ellis Cose
Duke also tweeted, “This is why WE LOVE TRUMP and WHY the FAKE NEWS MEDIA HATES TRUMP. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:25 am by Joy Waltemath
Duke’s after-acquired evidence defense to the doctor’s ADA claim also failed as did the doctor’s tort claims against a related entity (Shaughnessy v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm by Josh Blackman
Roberts explains that Secretary Duke was "bound by the Attorney General's legal determination" concerning Texas v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” — Kristina Littman, as newly appointed SEC Cyber Chief in her 2020 breakout enforcement action, SEC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Washington Post – Eli Rosenberg | Published: 11/2/2019 The road to the presidential nomination next year is sure to be full of unforeseen twists and potholes as a crowded field of Democratic contenders dukes it out in a volatile political climate. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:10 am by Jason Rantanen
  Indeed, in taking its relatively formal approach to the distinction between principal and superior officer, the Edmond Court had to distinguish the considerably less formalist opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am by INFORRM
Kavanagh, 2019 ONSC 5552 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice refused dismissed an application by the defendant under the Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation provisions in s. 137.1(3) of the Courts of Justice Act. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:38 pm by Tracy Scheidtmann
Superior Court of Los Angeles, which adopted the three-factor “ABC” test to determine a worker’s classification for wage order claims. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:49 am by Cannabis Law Group
The BCC moved forward with the proposed rule anyway, and now our L.A. marijuana delivery attorneys are monitoring the situation, as cities appear poised to duke it out in court. [read post]